Saturday, June 13, 2015

RUMINATIONS REGARDING ROLODEXES

Has your Rolodex disappeared from your desk?

Mine sits -- unused -- back near the wall. It hasn’t been disturbed for years, probably since I retired. That was not before word processors and computers, but way short of the laptop, the tablet and the smartphone.

Now and then a list of stuff out of the past, now artifacts for museums, can be found on one’s email, an offering from a friend of spends time surfing for such profundities. Such lists can reach from here to there. Such things as washers with ringers, rotary phones, curb feelers. Those just popped into mind; that short list may just prove the point that technology is easy to appreciate, but customs and behaviors shouldn’t be forgot either.

Manners and how to interact with others of the community have undergone real change. Perhaps those intangibles are more important than whether you have updated your phone and family plan with T-Mobile or whatever.

Hasn’t there been a nearly endless chain of improvement in things since someone somewhere sometime found that a wheel could move loads? (Did the same genius invent the axle?)

Invention has undoubtedly made the human condition easier. Yet some real things that cannot be noted by one of the senses but can be felt by emotions must be more important, for they cannot have changed greatly over the eons. Philosophy, an intangible of great utility, and similarly mathematics cannot be touched yet are fodder for grey matter. They have existed for millennia. Granted,  they have evolved and have been refined and are still evolving to some degree, but basically their roots remain vigorous. Technology depends upon basics as well: fulcrum, inclined plane, screw. Those are similar to intangibles because they were ideas before becoming rudimentary machines.

Philosophy equalled science in ancient Greece. Now, even the engineer, chemist, physicist with the top academic degree is a Doctor of Philosophy.

Things and ideas. Ideas and things. Which came first?

The intangible is the thing.

Abstract. Concrete. They go together.

Early man (maybe a female) had to think through the sharpening of a stick to help loosen soil to plant a whatever. First the need had to be seen, then gauging a sturdy stick to withstand digging the dirt followed. It could have happened no other way, granting that that talented person of that prehistoric period could have stumbled onto such a method. Thought, however, was needed just to recognize and continue using it.

The abstract must have come first.

What kind of employee or boss is most valuable to the entrepreneur?  He or she who thinks. He or she may also use his or her hands to type or build a model, but thought precedes words on paper, and the clay, wood or metal mockup. Generally, the person who designs the truck is paid more than the one driving it.

Creative thought is key to enterprise, whether for profit or the common good.

Not too long ago a salesman, a beautician, a reporter, an executive revolved the loaded Rolodex to find the phone number, address or some bit of information about a client or a vendor. Before the entry was made, its value was calculated, its place in the alphabet was ascertained, the information was condensed. Today one clicks or taps on the computer screen or thumbs the apps on a phone and gets the same type of information. The need for the information, its selection and gathering all require thought --- abstract activity. Only the equipment has changed.

Similarly behavior has changed through the ages. Brutishness gave way to cooperation to manners to foppishness to courtesy to polite society. Some commentators would proclaim society has begun to see much selfishness and unconcern or others, a lack of civility, a downward path back to brutishness.

A few old bucks still hold door for ladies, and a few ladies will favorably comment on that behavior. How often has a youth been seen doing that, or stepping aside for an elder?

Some thoughtfulness regarding civility could bring a better public square. But that is an abstraction.

We all need what can be felt and that which can only be visualized.

How to save that thought?

Friday, June 12, 2015

HOPE TECHNOLOGY FAILS NOT

So here I sit in my recliner processing words on my TV screen.

I just saw on the History Channel the reputed 101 most important inventions. No.1 was the smart phone. The personal computer was fourth. I believe the show ranked the light bulb as five. Edison invented the first dependable bulb in 1879. some six years before my father was born. He died shortly after man walked on the moon.

Amazing are the objects, gizmos, whatevers that ease and even monopolize our lives. Although we are human beings, we perhaps could not live without them now. Imagine losing electric power. Completely.

But our forebears lived without these conveniences. Could we live like our ancestors? Yes, I suppose some could, but with difficulty. Actually, if a terrorist act or series of acts wiped out our means of existing -- electricity, running water, transportation -- not many people would survive, even after getting through the rioting and plunder that would follow such disaster in every affected community, not to mention the ripple effects. Perhaps a few brave people who had taken to the wilderness for solitude would not notice the horror and go on with life relatively unaffected.

Is there any way our civilization could weather a magnetic blast in the stratosphere that wiped out a goodly portion of the electrical grid? Or whatever catastrophe unleashed by an enemy or terrorist cabal? Who really knows? There is hope the government has plans to cope. Maybe not. Maybe incomplete. Maybe worthless. Maybe we could luck-out. Muddle through.

Seldom do we assess our dependence upon technological progress. Entrepreneurial fatalists advertise survival foods that will keep for a quarter century (although they may be attracting Mormons who are instructed to prepare for the future). Other than those, most of us are unwilling to imagine what could happen.

Perhaps no preparation exists for catastrophes of such magnitude. Think back to Katrina and Sandy. (Although those areas now resemble normality.) Yet, somewhere, a newspaper or TV station will survive to second-guess everyone and every governmental entity for failures to prepare.

How well are we prepared to rely on technology and the governmental types using it to uncover terrorist plots and deal with them?  We wish to remain safe, but we expect protection of our constitutional rights. Others of us say survival trumps rights. Only specific aberrations can be examined and used for guidance.

Meanwhile, trust could be the only course.

Nonetheless, the blessings of technology realistically come with potential dangers.

Pessimism is hardly the correct reaction. Hope must reign. Hope, after all, is a virtue. In times like these, virtue is needed. Required.

And planning wouldn’t hurt.