People¸
especially voters, are getting fed up with government --- at all levels.
Partisan bickering is getting us nowhere.
Alderman,
county board members, state delegates, congressmen seem to think they must hang
tough --- cleave to the party lines. Compromise is for losers, for guys and
gals who end up supping at their own expense and not at the public trough.
So what if
debt piles up. So potholes don’t get filled. So what if jails get overcrowded.
So what if
it’s easier to ask whether your opponent has stopped beating his wife than
question his support for higher – or lower – tax rates.
Nothing will
change until voters and votes recognize and fulfill the requirements of the
general system of government in the United States of America. That system is
the regular election of surrogates to take on the solution of common problems.
In a nutshell, self-government is that.
Sure there
are differences among the various levels of government. Basically, however, the
elected are in office to represent the electors and their needs, which include
defining the needs and limiting them to what can be done only by government,
all with the consent of the governed. That basic idea of representative
government has somehow become fuzzy in application.
Here could be
listed example after example. To be fair and to reinforce the point, such
examples would have to alternate between the political parties, and the
examples would have to carry equal weight. Any attempt to do that would set off
ennui in most readers, thus impairing this argument.
And the real
argument? It is this: Until officeholders practice the basic idea of
self-government, and voters demand that they do, deadlock will continue.
Any chance of
that happening? Will aldermen, trustees, county board members, congressmen
actually forget about their petty political futures and then to duty?
Not until
office holding is considered a civic duty rather than a career. Not until
voters consider their ballots thoughtful suggestions for what is good for their
communities, state or country rather than ways of getting something for
themselves. In turn, elected officials should be casting their votes (or neglecting
to) for the sake of the common good and nota what’s-in-it-for-men grab.
Idealism? You
bet.
What’s wrong
in at least asking, why not do it right?
No comments:
Post a Comment